home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1500 / 1500r023.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  86KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: (Mo banc 1984) Considering the easc with which the State can nicet its burden. 11 unlikely that State legisla- tures will inclinod drastically change established procedures 01 that defendants will be seriously affected T the burden is incrementally reduccd Second, after Bullington applied the Double Jeopardy Clausc trial-like sentencing proceedings, there was no rush he State legislatures to alter ot amend their capi- tal sentencing statutes avoid or circumvent the Court holding. precisely because not in pose substantial unfair or inequitable burden on the Staic require it 14 tako best shot the first time around. No one can claim that the Statc this case did not have 'one full and fair opportunity its cuSC. general rule, the prosecutor is entitled one and only une opportunity to require an ...